Showing posts with label U.S. military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.S. military. Show all posts

Jul 28, 2010

US bleeding due to Wikileaks!



Forget Osama Bin Laden. US latest obsession must be Julian Assange, the man behind Wikileaks, who with a handful of others is day by day putting online more records and information depicting the hollowness of the claims made by the powerful leaders of the world, with the major target being the US.

US is running for cover since a massive leak of more than 92,000 top secret documents titled- "Afghan War Log" containing day to day reporting of the soldiers and intelligence reports. But now US is trying to show a bold face, telling the world that they had nothing to hide and all the info contained in those leaked documents was already shared with the concerned countries including India. But what they are failing to explain is why billions are poured into Pakistan when they have sufficient proof that ISI is funding Taliban or why civilian causalities were reported as enemy deaths. The documents clearly show the failing US led NATO forces there and why the war was not merited from the beginning.



But the world attention is also on Julian Assange, a former computer hacker from Australia who decided that he wanted to do his best to make all secrets public. His special attention is on US, but their website has also revealed documents about the toxic materials being thrown in the oceans alongside African coasts, affecting elections in Kenya by exposing corruption among many other projects.


How Wikileaks operates
WikiLeaks, which runs on funding from donors, has been rather secretive about how it operates. But essentially the idea behind the site is this: People who have access to controversial or classified documents can send them to the site, either through the internet or through the mail. Then a group of volunteer editors for the site decides what information is authoritative, what information is important, and publishes it accordingly. In this way, the site differs from traditional "wikis," such as Wikipedia, which can be edited and changed by anyone at any time. Only approved information ends up on the WikiLeaks site, but anyone is free to submit documents he or she believes should be made public. WikiLeaks offers these whistle-blowers anonymity and, to a degree, legal protection.

Technical backbone
Since WikiLeaks is in the business of publishing information that governments and multinational corporations want kept secret, the site employs some technical tricks that aim to keep it from crashing or being hacked.
The site keeps servers on multiple continents, and its sensitive information passes through countries -- such as Sweden, Iceland and Belgium -- that have offered WikiLeaks a degree of legal protection.
"We use this state-of-the-art encryption to bounce stuff around the internet to hide trails -- pass it through legal jurisdictions like Sweden and Belgium to enact those legal protections," Julian Assange said. The fact that WikiLeaks' servers and volunteers are all over the globe makes it, in effect, the "world's first stateless news organization." This is key to the site's ability to protect itself.

"WikiLeaks is organized so that if the crackdown comes in one country, the servers can be switched on in another," he writes. "This is meant to put it beyond the reach of any government or legal system." Assange reportedly has spent his life developing the tech skills needed to set up such a system.  "As a teenager in Melbourne, Australia, he belonged to a hacker collective called the International Subversives."  He eventually pleaded guilty to multiple counts "of breaking into Australian government and commercial websites to test their security gaps, but was released on bond for good behavior."

Julian Assange is on a mission and world is waiting to see his next revelations. But what should be also noticed here is the continuous failure of successive US govts to achieve their slated targets- capturing Osama, eradicating Taliban from Afghanistan, finding nukes or chemical weapons from Iraq, or now getting hands on Julian Assange. It seems their bad luck is just not stopping. 


Feb 4, 2010

Two daughters with cancer: Is the U.S. to blame?


Referred From- CNN (provided by Tareq Walizada)
By Abbie Boudreau and Scott Bronstein, CNN Special Investigations Unit
February 2, 2010 12:28 p.m. EST.


Vieques, Puerto Rico (CNN) -- Each day after work, Nanette Rosa takes her two daughters to feed their horses. It's their favorite part of the day -- a time they don't think about pain.
"It's really difficult for my mom to have two daughters with cancer," said 16-year-old Coral, the older daughter. "Because sometimes she's got two of us in the hospital at the same time, and we both get sick at the same time. And sometimes she doesn't have anyone to help her, and it really affects her."
The Rosas live on Vieques, an American island off Puerto Rico. For nearly 60 years, the U.S. military used much of the island as a bombing range, dropping vast quantities of live bombs and missiles in weapons tests. Now, about three-quarters of the island's residents -- including Coral and her 14-year-old sister Inna -- are part of a lawsuit that claims the bombing range made them sick.
"There's a lot of people here dying of cancer," Coral said. "I have my little cousin dying of cancer. I have my sister that has cancer. My boyfriend's mom died of cancer. His dad has cancer of the skin. A lot of people are suffering here of cancer, 'cause what they did here in Vieques."
As a toddler, Coral was diagnosed with neuroblastoma, a cancer that afflicts younger children. Her mother says much of Coral's stomach and intestines had to be replaced as a result of the cancer.
"Almost everything is plastic," Nanette Rosa said. "So when she eats certain foods, it produces diarrhea, which has caused dehydration. She gets sick a lot, and certain foods she cannot eat like regular people."
The operations have left Coral with a six-inch gash across her stomach, along with emotional scars.
"Sometimes I feel sad, 'cause everybody calls me 'plastic intestines,' " she said. "They say, 'Oh, you have a plastic belly.' And I tell them, 'You know what? If you were in this condition, how would you feel?' "
And doctors found a large tumor in Inna's mouth when she was 7.
"It was very swollen, and it looked like there was a big ball of gum in my mouth or a big lollipop," she said. "I started having pain, and the only thing that would come out was blood."
Inna was diagnosed with Ewing's sarcoma, a bone cancer. John Eaves Jr., who represents Coral, Inna and other islanders in the lawsuit against the federal government, told CNN, "There is suffering throughout this island."
"You cannot walk down the street on this island without counting every house and knowing two or three people on the street that have cancer, or have had cancer, or have died from cancer," Eaves said. "But for me, the most disturbing thing is the number of children on this island that have terminal cancer."
Eaves, of Mississippi, has taken more than 1,300 hair samples fromVieques residents and had them tested for heavy metals. About 80 percent of the hair samples tested positive for heavy metals. Many of the results show levels of toxic elements in people that are literally off the charts -- the lines representing substances like lead, mercury, arsenic, aluminum and cadmium extend beyond the "dangerous" area and out of the grid entirely.
"These hair samples, I believe, are the strongest proof that the contaminants -- the things that were in the bombs, like the lead, mercury, cadmium, arsenic, aluminum -- are now in the people," Eaves said.
Behind one of those charts is 7-year-old Taishmalee Ramos-Cruz, whose hair was tested when she was 2. Taishmalee's parents say she had been very sick, and they fear she may get sick again."
"She looked like she had chemotherapy. She lost all her hair, and she had these spots on her legs," her father told CNN. "She also had bad trouble using her fingers properly for a long time."
Eaves said he was not surprised to learn of the problems Taishmalee has experienced.
"Unfortunately, we have seen many children on Vieques with similar problems," he said. "And she may still get sick again. We don't know if she will get cancer later."
Dr. Carmen Ortiz Roque, a Harvard-trained epidemiologist, has studied the Vieques population for years. She and other scientists have been deposed in the lawsuit.
"The human population of Vieques is by far the sickest human population that I've ever worked with," said Ortiz, who practices in San Juan. "These people are very sick very early, and dying earlier. So something is happening there."
Ortiz has compiled statistics for the Vieques population that she and other scientists find alarming.
"It's astonishing," she said. "They die 30 percent higher of cancer, 45 percent higher of diabetes, 95 percent higher of liver disease, and 381 percent higher of hypertension than the rest of Puerto Ricans."
Ortiz' findings are supported by and are now used by the Puerto Rico Department of Health as an indicator of health problems for the people of Vieques. She also found disturbing statistics on mercury levels in the Vieques population -- levels that are much higher than the rest of Puerto Rico.
"Twenty-seven percent of the women in Vieques have enough mercury to damage their baby's brain. That is very significant." she said. "This is very serious, given that mercury causes permanent damage and mental retardation in children and that the hair samples are a standard way of measuring this exposure in women in the reproductive age."
She said her sampling of children 5 and under in Vieques had "at least six times higher levels of mercury exposure than children sampled in the United States."